![not caslon font not caslon font](https://www.cufonfonts.com/images/100611/itc-caslon-224-std-font-large-preview.png)
- #Not caslon font windows 10#
- #Not caslon font software#
- #Not caslon font windows 7#
- #Not caslon font windows#
Ironically, Microsoft still supports Type 1 fonts under MacOS.Īdobe does not provide any software (“official” or otherwise) for converting existing Type 1 fonts to any other format including OpenType CFF. This decision was Microsoft's and absolutely not Adobe's! Currently, Microsoft applications support TrueType, OpenType TrueType, and OpenType CFF (OpenType with Type 1 outlines) fonts. Any existing content formatted with a Type 1 font is now displayed (and often printed) using a substitution font (and not necessarily what you might expect).
#Not caslon font windows#
Microsoft ended all support for use of Type 1 fonts beginning with Office 2013 under Windows (all versions).
#Not caslon font windows 7#
However, when I open a document to which these fonts have already been assigned (on another machine with Windows 7 / Office 2010), they display and print all right. In Excel and Visio, Type 1 fonts are missing in the font selection dialog.Print-outs of the same documents are o.k. However, when I use a Type 1 font on my text, the display on the screen is corrupted (the Type 1 fonts are replaced by some other font but the character width does not match). In Word and PowerPoint, Type 1 fonts appear in the font selection dialog, and the preview in the dialog looks perfectly all right.
![not caslon font not caslon font](https://www.prepressure.com/images/fonts_sample_caslon_pro_semibold.png)
While I had no problems installing these fonts, and they work well with most of my applications, there seems to be an issue with MS Office 2019:
#Not caslon font windows 10#
On the other hand, if you can discount Caslon, there are a number of families which are available in both serif and sans form: those are bound to match.I use MS Windows 10 (1903) 64-bit (German localized version) with several Type 1 fonts installed. Pehaps something like Linotype Projekt would do, although this doesn't appear to come in a lighter weight than this, which may need a heavier version of Caslon. It may be possible to use a font like this - this is Rosemary Samuels - and tweak its metrics so that the letters are slightly narrower and they are spaced a little further apart. When trying to get a sans to go with that, which is a good idea, you need to consider the letter-shapes (like the high cross-bar on e and the upward slope of the bowl of a and perhaps the little tail of u):īut you also need to consider x-height (this sans is too great) and although the overall width here is similar, each letter is wider and natural tracking is reduced. That is obviously what has attracted you to using it, but its age and the style of the time is that the tracking is naturally quite wide: One of the problems with Caslon is that it's very old-fashioned. What about table of content, and opening pages?
![not caslon font not caslon font](https://typographica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/03-Caslon-Doric-Romans.png)
In that case, should I use size variations of Milo Light Italic for headings? There won't be any more than chapter headings. The old sutta text set in Milo Serif Medium:Īnd descriptive commentary in the lighter and more modern looking Milo Light Italic: I quite like the proposal of using the same family in serif/sans, and for example Milo ( link) seems to make for a legible reading type. If not Caslon and a light sans-serif, then what other pairings would make sense? Somehow I'm not drawn to using normal/bold combination of the same font though.ĮDIT After I've accepted Andrew Leach's answer, I started poking around FontShop for a while. Something light and sans-serif, perhaps, even italic? I'm tinkering with a small booklet that contains an ancient Buddhist sutta text and modern commentary, interweaved in a form of reading monologue: some sutta text, some commentary, more sutta text, and so forth.įor the sutta text I thought to use Caslon ( link) but can't quite come up with a font for the modern commentary.